It has its source in law, jurisprudence.
Its representative government based on districts, up to national level. Ours is a Constitutional Republic. This means our elected government representatives are supposed to be guided by the constitution and reined in by the Constitution. The Constitution was an agreement made between sovereign nation states to be considered an “international treaty or compact” to create a Federal government for the states and ensure smooth cooperation between the states. – from Jural Assemblies for Dummies video
In law there’s “form and substance”. In form it may look like one thing and purport to be that one thing, but when you study the substance on how it actually works, it may be something completely different. Our Republic is still there in form but over the years the substance of it is as a federal democracy. The reason due to an over-reaching police state (an all-powerful executive). On a regular basis, people deal primarily with 3-letter agencies (DEA, FBI, CDC, FDA, etc.) which source out of the executive branch, they are controlled by the President. The elected President appoints his cabinet, they rule over these agencies, and these agencies rule over us. We saw that happen when the CDC put out mask mandates.
Separation of powers aren’t just between judicial, legislative and executive but also between the federal and the states.
The 10th amendment states that powers not enumerated to the federal government belong to the states and/or the people. Through usurpation of our rights through this over-reaching executive branch and other contract elements like the Federal Reserve, etc., our rights are further usurped when they contract with our local governments (aka, giving them funds). Example, the Department of Education is obliged to do what the federal government wants, and they are in a kind of jurisdictional contract because they said “Ok, I’ll take this privilege (funding”), and there’s nothing in exchange for free. Schools are hostage in exchange for funding.- per Jural Assembly for Dummies video
They are terms in law. De jure is what is lawful, by right, constitutional. De facto means insurgent, in place of what should be. An executive order is de facto legislation. If that’s not constitutional? What are we operating under? – per Jural Assembly for Dummies video
A Grand Jury serves as quality assurance over the government and provides accountability. The book, “The People’s Panel” talks about the history of the grand jury from the 16th century through the 1940s. The Grand Jury investigates to make sure the government is doing its job…did you pave the roads the way you said you were going to, etc. There’s a de facto Grand Jury. Corpus Juris Secundum and American Jurisprudence, two primary encyclopedias of American Law state that a de facto Grand Jury cannot exist when a de jure Grand Jury is present. If we assemble and take those places back, we can say we don’t need this.
The petit jury is a trial jury. It can judge the law and the facts. They can decide if the law is worthy of being enforced in any given situation.
When a Grand Jury comes up with an indictment and the prosecutor or judge decline to act on it, the Grand Jury has the power to then indict the prosecutor or judge. Justice Scalia ruled that the Grand Jury is the fourth branch of government and what they decide cannot be taken up and reconsidered by the Supreme Court. Why? Because the people in assembly are the ones that create the Grand Jury in its original form, as well as the Constitution and Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is subordinate to the people, in the private.
In Admiralty, the judge just looks at the jury as consult and he can rule however he wants.
This is a poison pill. The people who are promoting it are all about making money. It’s focused on you getting out of the system by yourself. File this paperwork WITH the system, legitimize the system by filing paperwork through it. But you don’t have to change your status to operate in private. If you do a repudiation of citizenship, which is one of the steps is, in an affidavit, you are saying “I’m not a United States citizen”. There is a felony charge for impersonating a United States citizen. What if you cross over the line and don’t realize you are still taking one of the benefits of the United States? What if your kids are still in pubic school? Or if you’re using food stamps? What if you filed your taxes? Now, all of a sudden, you are acting as a United States citizen while putting an affidavit on the record that you aren’t. Are you a United States citizen who perjured yourself through the affidavit? Or is your affidavit true and you aren’t a United States citizen and you are pretending to be a citizen to collect benefits? How is becoming an American State National going to protect you from them coming after you eventually? – per Jural Assemblies for Dummies video.
Men and Women in your local township who come together to:
– Discuss the needs and desires of the people in your township
– Instruct and direct public servants about the needs and desires of the people
– Petition the government for a redress of grievances
– Hold public servants and government departments accountable through Grand Jury audits of public offices and servants
– Also called “Popular Assemblies”
Bill of Rights, Article 1 – “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the RIGHT of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for redress of grievances.”
1839, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary: “ASSEMBLY is a reunion of a number of person in the same place. There are several kinds of assemblies… Popular assemblies are those where the people meet to deliberate upon their rights, these are guaranteed by the Constitution.” Pg. 97
1848, Signers of the Declaration of Independence, by B.J. Lossing, pg. 11 : Regarding the signers- “…But neither firmness nor patriotism was wanting in that august assembly. And their own sound judgment and discretion, their own purity of purpose and integrity of conduct, were fortified and strengthened by the voice of the people in popular assemblies, embodied in written instructions for the guidance of their representatives.”
An unlawful assembly is the meeting together of three or more persons with the intent to disturb the peace. To constitute this offense, it must appear that there was common intent of the persons assembled to attain purpose, whether lawful or unlawful, by commissions of acts of intimidation and disorder likely to produce danger to the peace of neighborhood, and actually tending to inspire courageous persons with well-grounded fear of serious breaches of public speech. This intent or purpose does not need to exist at the outset.
If these persons take steps toward performing this forcible and violent execution, it becomes a rout. If these persons actually perform this forcible and violent execution, it becomes a riot. Whoever participates in any riot, rout, unlawful assembly or affray, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
There is a difference between American Common Law and English Common Law. It began in 1606 with the first charter of Virginia.
One of the differences is that laws decided through English Common Law were not automatically recognized in America. When we refer to Common Law, we are specifically referring to American Common Law, laws that were formulated and recognized through our own system.
The English model (which is often misunderstood to be our form of common law) is defined as “Common law, also known as case law, relies on detailed records of similar situations and statutes because there is no official legal code that can apply to a case at hand. The judge presiding over a case determines which precedents apply to that particular case.” American common law doesn’t rely on previous cases but each case is decided based on the facts of that particular case, by the jury (not a judge).
Its humans making laws for humans and is based on the Ten Commandments and the Magna Carta. Common Law is common sense. The question each jurist must ask themselves is, “Is there an injured party?”. There is a Common Law principle which states that for there to be a crime, there must first be a victim.
A de facto government is one that:
1. Imputes a status to you that you do not have or do not consent to as a way to steal from you.
2. Waives the domicile prerequisite to participation either by not putting it in the law or waiving it as a matter of policy. In that sense they act exclusively by private contract because you must have domicile as a prerequisite to all the civil law they enforce or they are not a government.
3. Is a corporation and not a body politic, all of whose “citizens and residents” are, in fact, public officers within the de facto government and franchisees. Technically, it’s a crime to use public property for private purpose or private benefit. Therefore, if the government hands you custody of something like a driver’s license (public property) you’d better be a public officer before you applied for it and before you received it. The government can only issue property to those who are already officers. They use public property to unlawfully create offices and calling those offices public officers, and by this means they turn private citizens and residents into public officers so they reach them and enslave them.
4. Imputes or presumes a status that you do not or cannot consent to. This violates due process of law. For example, they assume you are a public officer if you have their property in your pocket, such as a driver’s license or social security card, or a passport, or a professional license. All presumption that isn’t proven with evidence or does not require to be proven with evidence is a violation of due process.
5. Interferes with your efforts to challenge their unconstitutional presumptions about your status. For example, they presume you are a taxpayer but won’t allow you to prove that you’re not and won’t accept the burden of proving that you consented to being one.-
CONTROLLED MEANING: Any individual. A man, woman or child.
ACTUAL MEANING: From “persona” (Lat.). “Person” is not the same as “man.” A “person” is an “entity” – human or corporate – whose status is recognized and accepted by government. The status of “person” is a creation of the State. “Persona non grata” (i.e., “non-person) is a legal term for an entity that is not recognized or accepted by the State.
According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, “persons” are subjects of rights and duties conveyed by government. A “person” is a “citizen”: one who is “entitled” and/or “bound” by government.
“Every full citizen is a person; … But not every human being is necessarily a person, for a person is capable of rights and duties, and there may well be human beings having no legal rights, as was the case with slaves in English law. A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and duties are ascribed to him. The person is the legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes.” — Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
God created no “persons” – He created MAN. The state creates “persons.”
Man was created, person was invented.
An in depth SCOTUS discussion of “person” and Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
Black’s Law 4th edition, 1891 Persons are divided by law into natural and artificial…”corporations” or “bodies politic.” Quasi municipal corporations – Bodies politic and corporate, created for the sole purpose of performing one or more municipal functions.
A person is a persona, it originates from a “clay mask” that they used on stages.
DO NOT USE any other term than man, woman or one of the people
It’s the trade or business activity that creates the “legal person”. It’s the legal person who is the resident.
See the Knowledge Base for more.
The jury. In de facto courts the judge tells them what to consider, but he doesn’t have the authority to do that. The Admiralty jurisdiction is where this happens. Don’t give legal advice because they’ll come after you for that. When called into court, say “I’m here in special appearance”, instead of general appearance, you are stating that you are challenging their jurisdiction but are there to answer questions on your own volition, but not submitting to the court.
There may be an admiralty flag in the courtroom, that flag doesn’t give them the admiralty jurisdiction. The people that walk into the courtroom are the ones who hand the jurisdiction over to the judge. There are good judges who respect people who took the time to understand the law
No one speaks for the assembly on their own. There’s no representative. If anyone is going out to give a statement about the assembly, its only after the assembly has voted and said its ok to go out and speak.
No one. It’s the voice of the people.
The Assembly side is in an interim status, they are not in place of the de facto. The Assembly operates “in private”. We communicate with public comment, with notifications in the paper, or we go read something into the record at a public hearing or commissioner’s meeting. We aren’t covert.
Assemblies, de jure Grand Juries, militias. We also need people who are well grounded in morality, educated and self-reliant.
The people in Assembly.
Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void.
